Legal Opinion

Hussein v. City of Perrysburg

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 17, 2008No. Case 3:07CV1715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

Background

This is a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a violation of plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. Plaintiffs, Iraq nationals, are a husband and wife. They sue the City of Perrysburg (City) and three of its officials, claiming selective or vindictive enforcement of the law, denial of equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment, and retaliation following exercise of their First Amendment rights.

This court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343.

Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss. [Doc. 14]. For…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hussein v. City of PerrysburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Hussein v. City of PerrysburgDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Watkins v. New Albany Plain Local SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API