Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Bailey
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1975No. Civ. 15422PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend.
The complaint alleged:
Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Reeves, are the paternal grandparents of Kathiyn M. Reeves, a minor. Defendants, Robert Bailey and Mary Bailey, are the child’s maternal grandparents. Rosemary Bailey is Kathryn’s mother. In a dissolution action between the parents of Kathryn, Rosemary was given her custody. The court also gave the plaintiffs visitation rights with the child, including the right to have the child with them away from the mother’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Exley v. ExleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cranston v. ZookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Scranton v. HutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Roquemore v. RoquemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sharon S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lingwall v. HoenerIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- People in Interest of SAHSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Adoption of SchumacherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.