Legal Opinion

Cranston v. Zook

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1965No. S. F. No. 21354PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Edgar T. Zook, executor of the will of Ruth S. Zook, appeals from an order of the superior court which, because certain of decedent’s grandchildren had been adopted by their stepfather, fixed the inheritance tax on bequests *493to those grandchildren as if such bequests had been made to strangers.

The decedent was survived hy five grandchildren, three the children of her daughter Mary and two the children of her son Edgar. Prior to his mother’s death Edgar had been divorced, his former wife had remarried, and their two children had been adopted, with Edgar’s consent, by his wife’s second husband.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Esposito v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Kirkwood v. RowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Estate of GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In re the Adoption of George G. B.New York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  3. Graziano v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Scranton v. HutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Roquemore v. RoquemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API