Legal Opinion

Exley v. Exley

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1951No. Civ. 7830PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The parties hereto were formerly husband and wife. A final decree of divorce dissolving their marriage was made and entered August 11, 1947. There was an only child of the marriage, a daughter now aged 9. Her custody was by the final decree in the divorce action awarded jointly to the parties, but the court ordered that the physical custody of the child be in the father except that during the months of July and September of each year such custody should be in the mother. The mother was also given the right to have the child visit with her on alternate weekends while in the custody of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stever v. SteverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Simmons v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Stack v. StackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Tamburina v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API