Grimestad v. Lofgren
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $1,000 for the alleged wrongful levy of an attachment upon a horse and for damages resulting therefrom. The case was tried before Baxter, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $100. From an order denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
For about five years prior to the events herein narrated Louis Grimestad resided with his family upon a farm in Becker county, *287Minnesota, known as the “Showalter Farm.” Intending to remove with his family to North Dakota, where he had made arrangements for establishing a new home, Grimestad on April 8, 1907, held an auction sale of his personal property, at which he disposed of all his horses but one gray team. Showalter had a mortgage upon this team, and Grimestad informed him that he intended to remove to Dakota, and Showalter thereupon filed his mortgage in Dakota. Grimestad was indebted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Luby v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Mann v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Berg v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert Todd v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A., Mark N. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Drill Parts and Service Co. v. Joy Mfg.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Lindsay v. JenkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Patten Package Co. v. HouserSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.