Mann v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clay District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action for breach of contract in the sale of certain griddles. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
' eirora‘waived yanswenng. I. The first five divisions of appellant’ s argument are devoted to assignments of error by the court in overruling motions to strike the petition from the files, to strike out parts hereof, anc] to make the samemore specific. As to these motions, it is sufficient to say that after the, rulings thereon the defendant answered, and went to trial, which operated as a waiver of any error in the rulings. Coakley v. McCarty, 34 Iowa, 105.
II. The petition contains four counts; three of which state a cause of action based on the following :
“Spencer, Iowa, January 6, 1888.
“Th…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. ChesireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Coakley v. McCartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Cohen v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
3Cited by32 opinions
- Adams v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Dorman v. Credit Reference & Reporting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Lavalleur v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Dunn v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Smith v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.