Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. NEWBRY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1950PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

Article IV of the constitution of the state of Oregon is the framework of the legislative department of the state government. On February 20, 1950, Committee for Balanced Apportionment, an unincorporated association, filed with the secretary of state an initiative petition for a proposed constitutional amendment to sections 2, 4, and 6 of said article IV. By the proposed amendment, the number of senators is to be increased from thirty to thirty-six, the present method of apportionment and of determining the ratio of senators and representatives to population is to be changed, provision is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Bullard v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Cranmer v. ThorsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State Ex Rel. Carson v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Anderson v. ByrneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. CITY OF ASTORIAOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Unlimited Progress v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Oregon Education Ass'n v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API