Legal Opinion

Unlimited Progress v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1958PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, C. J.

The plaintiffs commenced this suit in the circuit court of Multnomah county to enjoin the defendant, Will E. Gibson, and other city officials from placing on the ballot for submission to the voters at the election on May 16, 1958, an initiative measure (1) relating to the exposition-recreation center now in the process of development in the city of Portland.

The plaintiffs in their complaint, after alleging the initiative petition is in proper form, properly verified and all statutory requirements have been met permitting it to be filed, allege the subject matter of the proposed measure is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carson v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. v. NEWBRYOregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West Hartford Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. CITY OF ASTORIAOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Paget v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API