Legal Opinion

Loew's, Inc. v. Hoyt Management Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 26, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This is an action of interpleader commenced on January 15, 1948. The material facts alleged in the pleadings follow.

Defendant Hoyt Management Corporation, a New York corporation (hereinafter called “Hoyt”), has brought an action in the Supreme Court, New York County, against defendant Alderdice on a complaint containing a claim for breach of contract. Process in that suit was personally served on Alderdice in California and he has appeared therein by procuring leave to open his default in answering and then serving his answer to the complaint therein. That action is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. National Fire Ins. Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  3. Armour Fertilizer Works v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Steingut v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. RevereDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
  2. Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Onyx Refining Co. v. Evans Production Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1959
  5. Landry & Passman Rlty., Inc. v. BEADLE, S., W. & A., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API