Philip Carchman and Marilyn R. Carchman v. The Korman Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we must decide whether tenant organizers of a large luxury apartment complex may constitute a class protected by 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (1976) against conspiracies founded upon a “class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus.” See Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971). Concluding that the class of tenant organizers is beyond the reach of the statute, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The appellants, Philip and Marilyn Carchman, were tenants in an apartment complex managed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1252, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8576 John R. Novotny v. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association, John A. Virostek, Joseph E. Bugel, John J. Dravecky, Daniel T. Kubasak, Edward J. Lesko, James E. Orris, Joseph A. Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko and Frank J. VanekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
3Cited by57 opinions
- Terry F. Browder v. Ronald D. TiptonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Hauptmann v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- James Richard Harrison v. Kvat Food Management, Inc. Jack Curtis Smith and A.G. Griffith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.