Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Fortas,
with whom Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart join, dissenting.
I dissent and would affirm the judgment.
The facts in this case do not lend themselves to the Court’s ruling. The Court sets aside the arbitration award despite the fact that the award is unanimous and no claim is made of actual partiality, unfairness, bias, or fraud.
The arbitration was held pursuant to provisions in the contracts between the parties. It is not subject to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. It is governed by the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U. S. C. §§ 1-14.
Each party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In Re the Arbitration Between Ilios Shipping & Trading Corp. & American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Firemen's Fund Ins. v. Flint Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. BarnardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1959