Legal Opinion
In Re Jett
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1994No. JC-94-0001Published
1Opinion of the Court
180 Ariz. 103 (1994)
882 P.2d 414
In re Rita JETT, a judge of the City of Tucson, Municipal Court, Respondent.
No. JC-94-0001.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
September 29, 1994.
Harriet L. Turney, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for State Bar of Arizona.
E. Keith Stott, Jr., Executive Director, Phoenix, for Commission on Judicial Conduct.
O'Dowd, Burke & Lundquist, P.C. by Bruce A. Burke, Tucson, for respondent.
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) found that Respondent, Rita Jett, a Tucson city magistrate, violated Canons 1, 2(A), 2(B), and 3(E) of…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.