Legal Opinion
Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 20, 2007No. AC 26784PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BERDON, J.
The plaintiff, Diane Jacob, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to amend her complaint and granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Dometic AB and Dometic Origo AB. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied her motion to amend the complaint and (2) granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On September 4,1999, the plaintiff was injured by a fire…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dunnett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Leydon v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Alswanger v. SmegoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Tedesco v. Julius C. Pagano, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Sherman v. RoncoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Kosinski v. CarrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. MordecaiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. ParedesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.