Legal Opinion
Tedesco v. Julius C. Pagano, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 11, 1980PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff’s sole claim on appeal is that the court below, Kulawiz, J., erred in permitting the defendants to amend their answer by adding a special defense of contributory negligence.
The plaintiff alleged that he was injured on April 7,1975, when he was struck by a backhoe owned and operated by the defendants. This suit was filed on June 22, 1976, and the pleadings were closed when the defendants denied negligence on March 3, 1977. A pretrial was held before Kulawiz, J., on the morning of Friday, June 8, 1979. During pretrial the issue of negligence by the plaintiff was raised. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Harry A. Finman & Son, Inc. v. Connecticut Truck & Trailer Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Johnson v. ToscanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Town of Wallingford v. Glen Valley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Yeske v. Avon Old Farms School, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Wallingford v. GLEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Moore v. SergiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.