State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J.
In general, if a trial judge enters judgment in a civil action, and the judgment is reversed on appeal, resulting in a remand to the trial judge for a “new trial,” any party can disqualify the judge by way of a peremptory challenge. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6, subd. (a)(2), 2d par.)
In the present case, after the pleading stage, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to resolve a conflict of laws issue: whether California law or Illinois law applied to plaintiffs’ causes of action. Defendant argued that Illinois law applied and that the case had to be dismissed.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Liquidating Trustee of the Amcast Unsecured Creditor Liquidating Trust v. Baker (In Re Amcast Industrial Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Chen v. Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Geddes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State Farm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- BURDUSIS v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.