Legal Opinion

Carlos Ramirez v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 22, 2013No. 20-10473UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Carlos Ramirez appeals the grant of summary judgment to Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“B & L”) in his suit brought pursuant to the Florida Whistleblower Act (“FWA”), Fla. Stat. Ann. § 448.102. In his suit, Ramirez alleged that he was fired after reporting various violations of B & L’s standard operating procedures (“SOPs”) and applicable federal regulations issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ramirez, a quality control inspector for B & L, alleged a number of different incidents that occurred from March to July 2008 as protected activity. Ramirez took leave under the Family Medical Leave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Thomas v. Cooper Lighting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Crawford v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Nancy Rojas v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mazella Smith v. City of Fort Pierce, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Fuller v. SL Alabama, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
  3. McCarley v. City of NorthportDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  4. Gloetzner v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2016
  5. Prosser v. Thiele Kaolin Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API