Legal Opinion

Crook v. Vandevoort

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Eichardson county. Tried below before Weaver, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought by the defendant, in error in the district court of Richardson county, to recover from the plaintiff the possession of sixty acres off the north end of the west half of the southwest quarter of section 28, township 2, range 15, in Richardson county. The answer admits the possession but denies the other facts stated in the petition. On the trial of the cause judgment was rendered in favor of Vandevoort, and providing that upon the payment by him of the sum of $85.40 to the plaintiff a writ of restitution should issue.

It appears from the record that Crook…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Campau v. GodfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Chesround v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1832
  4. Buckmaster v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mee v. BenedictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. King v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Kirk v. BowlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Kresha v. KreshaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Williams v. Coal Creek Mining & Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API