Chesround v. Cunningham
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Chesrouncl brought an action of trespass for mesne profits against Cunningham and others, after a recovery in ejectment. The locus in quo is described as being an undivided third part of 400 acres of land. The defendants pleaded in bar as follows: — that they purchased the freehold in 1820, at a public sale for the non-payment of taxes; entered into possession of the land as their own; and received the rents and profits. The plea also states, that the defendants had made lasting and valuable improvements on the premises, before the commencement of the action of ejectment, to the value of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Graham v. Connersville & New Castle Junction RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Bahar v. Tadros Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- King v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Westerfield v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Craton v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.