Kirk v. Bowling
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Mitchell, J. cited : Austin v. Cambridgeport, 21 Pick., 224. Stearns v. Harris, 8 Allen, 598. Dale v. Hunneman, 12 Neb., 221:
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This is an action of ejectment brought by Bowling against Kirk to recover the possession of the north half of the south-east quarter of section twenty-six, township eight, range five east.
Kirk, in his answer, denies that Bowling has a legal estate in said land, or is entitled to the possession thereof, *261and also pleads the statute of limitations as a bar. On the trial of the cause in the court below a verdict was rendered in favor of Bowling, upon which judgment was rendered.
The testimony shows that Joab Hobbs entered the land in question, and received a patent from the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Jenkins v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Inhabitants of Dublin v. ChadbournMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Whitman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Case of Wells' WillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
- Brown v. LanmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jorgensen v. CrandellNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Hans v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Neher v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1898
- Williams v. Coal Creek Mining & Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.