State v. Glover
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Haan, J.*
¶ 1 In 2017, following Kaela M. Glover's conviction for second degree burglary, the sentencing court imposed $2,900 in legal financial obligations (LFOs), including $2,100 for court-appointed attorney fees. Glover appeals, arguing that the sentencing court erred because it failed to adequately inquire into her ability to pay before imposing the discretionary LFO. Because the sentencing court's inquiry was inadequate under State v. Blazina ,1 we reverse the LFOs and remand for a new hearing on LFOs.2
FACTS
¶ 2 In 2017, a jury found Glover guilty of one count of second degree burglary,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State of Washington v. Joshua James ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Danika LightleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Darrell Jon CobbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Huvaldo BlancasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Matthew Forrest BrasfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Michael A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.