Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. David Darrell Sykes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2021No. 80768-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 80768-4-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID DARRELL SYKES, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — The Washington Privacy Act, RCW 9.73.090(1)(b), contains several procedural requirements a police officer must satisfy before an arrested person’s recorded statement is admissible. Erroneously admitting a recording is prejudicial when there is a reasonable probability the recording changed the outcome at trial. David Sykes was charged with two counts of third degree assault for intentionally…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API