Battle Creek State Bank v. Preusker
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
This appeal presents two principal issues: (1) Whom does 7 U.S.C. § 1631 (1994) of the federal Food Security Act (FSA) protect? (2) What effect does the FSA have, if any, on security interests under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.)? The appellants, Mart Preusker and Phyllis Preusker, as creditors of their daughter and son-in-law, received proceeds from the sale of fluid milk to a dairy cooperative to pay part of an existing debt. The milk was subject to a perfected security interest of the appellee, Battle Creek State Bank, pursuant to Neb. U.C.C. § 9-307(1) (Reissue 1992). However, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Kime v. HobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stalnaker v. DLC, Ltd. (In Re DLC, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Spear T Ranch, Inc. v. KnaubNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Vowers & Sons, Inc. v. StrasheimNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Boyle v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.