Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Kraus v. Wells Fargo & Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 24, 2015No. 11 Civ. 5457(BMC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER
COGAN, District Judge.
Before me is defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim. Rela-tors bring this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”), alleging essentially that defendants and their predecessors in interest presented false information to the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Banks in connection with their receipt of payments in the form of loans and advances from those entities. On July 30, 2014, the United States notified the Court that it had elected to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Rombach v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bishop v. Wells Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Bishop v. Wells Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Paul Bishop v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Wells Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017