Bishop v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KATZMANN, Chief Judge:
At the heart of the case before us is the False Claims Act (“FCA”), which forbids “knowingly presenting], or causing] to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval” to the United States government. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A). In 2011, Robert Kraus and Paul Bishop (together, the “relators”) brought a qui tam action under the FCA on behalf of the United States against Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together, ‘Wells Fargo”). The relators’ claims hinge on what they allege to be massive control fraud perpetrated by Wachovia Bank and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rombach v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- United States v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Catalyst Managerial Services v. Libya Africa Investment PortfolioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States ex rel. Kolchinsky v. Moody's Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.