Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 5, 2016No. Docket No. 15-2449PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATZMANN, Chief Judge:

At the heart of the case before us is the False Claims Act (“FCA”), which forbids “knowingly presenting], or causing] to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval” to the United States government. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A). In 2011, Robert Kraus and Paul Bishop (together, the “relators”) brought a qui tam action under the FCA on behalf of the United States against Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together, ‘Wells Fargo”). The relators’ claims hinge on what they allege to be massive control fraud perpetrated by Wachovia Bank and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Rombach v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. United States v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Catalyst Managerial Services v. Libya Africa Investment PortfolioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. United States ex rel. Kolchinsky v. Moody's Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API