Legal Opinion

Hoffman Construction Company of Oregon, an Oregon Corporation v. Active Erectors and Installers, Inc., a Washington Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1992No. 90-35523PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

After receiving a favorable judgment against Hoffman Construction Company in Alaska state court, Active Erectors and Installers, Inc. filed a demand for arbitration of its RICO claim against Hoffman, a claim which Active had not litigated in state court. Hoffman then brought this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief in order- to forestall such an arbitration. The district court granted a permanent injunction in Hoffman’s favor. The court reasoned that Active waived its right to arbitrate its RICO claim when it opted to proceed in state court, and that the state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. June Newirth v. Aegis Senior Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Timothy William HISER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. FRANKLIN; Frank Sauser; Al Terrault, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Swift v. Zynga Game Network, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. Plows v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Morgan Stanley & Co. v. CouchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API