Budowitz v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Danville, in an action on' a suspending bond under Code of 1919, section 6338. Judgment for relator. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The plaintiff in error, Budowitz, hereafter called the defendant, complains of a judgment against him in favor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, at the relation and for the benefit of the Virginia Fur and Hide Co., Inc., hereafter called the plaintiff. The action is based upon a suspending bond, provided for by Code, section 6338.
The Virginia Fur and Hide Co., Inc., on February 19, 1921, recovered a judgment against N. Klaff, and upon the motion of Klaff this order was entered: “And the *230said defendant intimating to the court his intention to apply to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seddon v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Thomas v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Richmond Union Passenger Railway Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jacob v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Faysal M. Zedan v. Sylvie E. Westheim, f/k/a Sylvie ZedanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- W. S. Hoge & Brother v. Prince William Co-operative Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Harrison v. DavidsonFairfax County Circuit Court · 1990
- Sutherland v. Swannanoa Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949