Legal Opinion
Andrew Paul Taylor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1993No. 92-1906PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
Andrew Paul Taylor, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment denying his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Ped.R.App.P. 34(a).
In 1986, a federal jury in Michigan convicted Taylor on multiple drug charges. Taylor received a 30-year sentence. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. United States v. Johnson, 831 F.2d 124 (6th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 968, 108…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lewis Francis (97-1129) and Louay Francis (97-1130)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SwindallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.