Legal Opinion
United States v. Swindall
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 14, 1997No. 95-9556PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Patrick L. Swindall appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se petition collaterally challenging his convictions on six counts of perjury. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A more comprehensive statement of the facts is set forth in this Court’s opinion in United States v. Swindall, 971 F.2d 1531, 1534-39 (11th Cir.1992). Over seven years ago in June 1989, a jury convicted Appellant on nine counts of making false material declarations before a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The indictment charged that Appellant had discussed money-laundering transactions with an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Turner v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John C. Mandanici, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.