Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
I. OVERVIEW
The petitioners-appellants, Ronald Kohn (“Kohn”) and Robert Moss (“Moss”), appeal separate orders of the district court denying their motions to vacate their convictions and sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On appeal, the petitioners assert that their joint representation by defense counsel created an actual conflict of interest which rendered defense counsel’s assistance constitutionally ineffective. The petitioners specifically assert that their “joint, overlapping, and contemporaneous” representation precluded defense counsel from obtaining…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by269 opinions
- Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.