Legal Opinion

Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 26, 2003No. 99-1951, 01-1610 and 01-1797PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECONOMUS, District Judge.

I. OVERVIEW

The petitioners-appellants, Ronald Kohn (“Kohn”) and Robert Moss (“Moss”), appeal separate orders of the district court denying their motions to vacate their convictions and sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On appeal, the petitioners assert that their joint representation by defense counsel created an actual conflict of interest which rendered defense counsel’s assistance constitutionally ineffective. The petitioners specifically assert that their “joint, overlapping, and contemporaneous” representation precluded defense counsel from obtaining…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API