Brady v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
We must determine here whether the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in punishing petitioner for contempt. The court based its order on the ground that the occupancy of petitioner’s home by his son and a rent-paying friend destroyed the home’s status as a “single family dwelling” under the zoning ordinance of Atherton, California. As we shall point out, we do not believe the bare and undefined reference of the ordinance to such a dwelling sustained the court's elaborate definition of it or the court’s conviction of contempt.
We describe the factual background which led to the court’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Santa Barbara v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Corenevsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.