Legal Opinion

Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 29, 1987No. 82 C 4330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McGARR, District Judge.

On October 22, 1986, 658 F.Supp. 961, this court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law and a judgment order to the effect that the Lambert-Fina ’860 and ’665 patents and the Hatch ’183 and ’529 patents which are the subject of this litigation, were found to be valid and to have been infringed by defendants Calco, Ltd. and William J. Gartner. Plaintiffs Water Technologies Corporation, Water Pollution Control Systems, Inc., and Kansas State University Research Foundation were awarded $520,000 in actual damages plus an additional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bricklayers' Pension Trust Fund v. TaiariolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  3. Morgan Adhesives Co. v. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  4. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  5. Bank of Hawaii v. LetuvaeHigh Court of American Samoa · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API