Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
This patent case comes before the District Court for a second time. Former Chief Frank J. McGarr previously found the defendants, Calco, Ltd. (“Calco”) and William J. Gartner, liable to the plaintiffs, Water Technologies Corp. (“WTC”), Water Pollution Control Systems, Inc. (“WPCS”) and Kansas State University Research Fund (“KSURF”), for patent infringement and unfair competition. 658 F.Supp. 961 (NJD.Ill.1986); 658 F.Supp. 980 (N.D.Ill.1987). Judge McGarr awarded plaintiffs a total of $1,416,157.16 in damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellants v. Dura Corp. And Kidde, Inc., Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell, Boyd & Lloyd v. Jack W. TapyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Jenkins v. The State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Oak Industries, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.