Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 7, 1947No. Civ. No. 8041PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff for an order, pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, allowing the plaintiff a discovery and inspection of certain depositions taken by a claim agent of the defendant railroad company. The defendant opposes the granting of such order.

Plaintiff has brought his action against the railroad company alleging that he was injured through negligence. The issue raised by the pleadings is on the “ready” calendar and shortly will be reached for trial.

Counsel for plaintiff asserts that he has shown good…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Gillman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  3. Durkin v. Pet Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  4. Bifferato v. States Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  5. Crowe v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API