Legal Opinion

State v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Johnson District Court. Prosecution for grand larceny. From a conviction, on May 15,1891, the defendant, Woodruff, appeals. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Frank Woodruff was convicted of grand larceny. The information was filed in December, 1890, and charged Woodruff with stealing a roan mare, the property of F. F. Murray, on August 9,1887, and alleged that since about the time the larceny was committed Woodruff had been a fugitive from justice and absent from the state. At the trial, testimony was given that Woodruff came to the house of J. C. Murray in the latter part of July, 1887, and was employed by Murray to work upon his farm. Oh the morning of August 9, 1887, he was sent into a field…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. People v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  4. People v. SmallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Finlayson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. In re MutchlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Thompson v. W. C. Howard Motors Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API