Legal Opinion

Thompson v. W. C. Howard Motors Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 26,990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover $1,495, part of the purchase price paid to the defendants for a new Lexington Lark touring automobile, the car sold having been represented to be a new car when in fact it was a used car. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $2,200.66.

1. Complaint is made of evidence introduced for the purpose of proving the car sold was a used car instead of a new one. That evidence consisted of testimony given by witnesses to show the condition of the car at various periods of time after it was purchased by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. State v. BisagnoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Shriver v. Union Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. State v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Deter v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Cannon v. BingmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Miller v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Collins v. City Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Watson v. Travelers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API