Thompson v. W. C. Howard Motors Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff sued to recover $1,495, part of the purchase price paid to the defendants for a new Lexington Lark touring automobile, the car sold having been represented to be a new car when in fact it was a used car. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $2,200.66.
1. Complaint is made of evidence introduced for the purpose of proving the car sold was a used car instead of a new one. That evidence consisted of testimony given by witnesses to show the condition of the car at various periods of time after it was purchased by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- State v. BisagnoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Shriver v. Union Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- State v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Deter v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Cannon v. BingmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Miller v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Collins v. City Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Watson v. Travelers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.