Finlayson v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.
J. — The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of larceny^ and to review the sentence passed thereon has prosecuted this writ of error.
The first three assignments of error go to the refusal of the court to give certain specific instructions. The bill of exceptions shows that these were refused because they were sufficiently given in the general charge, and as it affirmatively appears that’ only a portion of this general charge is before us, we can not say they were not so given. Younglove v. Knox, 44 Fla. 743, 33 South. Rep. 427.
The fourth, fifth and eighth assignments seek to present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Illinois Cent. R. v. Board of Levee Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Johnson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Levy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Younglove v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Groover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Fitch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Casso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Synes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.