Wagner v. Clifton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiffs James Wagner and Jim Wagner, Inc. appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In determining whether the trial court properly granted a motion to dismiss, we “accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and consider them, and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Krouse v. Bower, 2001 UT 28, ¶2, 20 P.3d 895. We recite the facts accordingly.
¶3 Plaintiffs, both of Texas, filed their original complaint against six…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Krouse v. BowerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Belnap v. Iasis HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Fericks v. Lucy Ann Soffe TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Gillmor v. MacEyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Kraatz v. Heritage ImportsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.