Legal Opinion

Hunstock v. Estate Development Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1943No. L. A. 18244PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

A decree of foreclosure which orders the sale of real property to satisfy a note secured by a mortgage, and also gives the mortgagee a judgment for any deficiency, is challenged solely upon jurisdictional grounds. The determinative question for decision is whether service of process may be made upon a domestic corporation, within the authorization of section 373 of the Civil Code, by mailing a copy of the summons and complaint to the Secretary of State.

The appellant, Estate Development Corporation, a domestic corporation, is the maker of the note and mortgage sued upon. The instruments were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Coleman v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Sternbeck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Tsakos Shipping & Trading, S.A. v. Juniper Garden Town Homes, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Thierfeldt v. Marin Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API