Legal Opinion

Godwin v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1956No. 36187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “Where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, such court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the jfieadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the earlier judgment on the demurrers, and such earlier judgment or judgments shall not be subject to exception or review.” Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 (1) (73 S. E. 2d 106); Sellars v. City of Summerville, 88 Ga. App. 109 (76 S. E. 2d 99); Aiken v. State Farm Mutual &c. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141). And, where the sole…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. RothbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Sellers v. City of SummervilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Queen v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Pappadea v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Butler v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Ferguson v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API