Legal Opinion

Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1953No. 34585PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Code § 81-1001, as amended by the act of 1952 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243), provides in part as follows: “Where the court sustains any or all demurrers to pleading, and allows time for the filing of an amendment, such judgment or order shall not be subject to exception or review, but the court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the judgment allowing time for amendment. Parties shall have the right to amend at any time prior to the rendition of such latter judgment.” Accordingly, as stated in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. RothbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Cates v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Browning v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Community Theatres Co. v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pappadea v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Godwin v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Norton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Thornton v. CourvoisierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API