Legal Opinion

Queen v. Craven

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1957No. 36516PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

While it is true that where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, the court must enter a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which latter judgment is final and supersedes the earlier judgment on the demurrers, and such earlier judgment shall not be subject to exception or review; and, while it is true that where the sole assignment of error contained in a bill of exceptions in this court is upon the judgment upon demurrers in which time was allowed for amendment, the writ of error…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Girtman v. GirtmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Young v. Smith & Kelly Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Evans v. Georgia Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Higgins v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. PPG Industries, Inc. v. GensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Martin v. Johnson-LemonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Hunt v. Star Photo Finishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Hawkins v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API