Legal Opinion

Sellers v. City of Summerville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1953No. 34503, 34509PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Headnote 1 is self-explanatory and requires no elaboration.

The judgment on December 3, 1952, in which the plaintiff was allowed until December 15, 1952, within which to amend, contained no ruling on the general demurrers, but ruled solely on special demurrers. The plaintiff did not amend within the time allowed. It is provided in Code (Ann. Supp.) § 81-1001, as amended by the act of 1952 (Ga. L. 1952, pp. 243, 245), that “the court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the judgment allowing time…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. McSwain v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. White v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Krasner v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Trust Co. of Georgia v. S. & W. CAFETERIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. City of Summerville v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Bearden v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Pappadea v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API