Legal Opinion
Ash, Wilbur v. Reilly, Edward F.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 16, 2005No. 05-5092PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge.
On a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a magistrate judge determined that the United States Parole Commission improperly revoked Wilbur Ash’s parole. The principal question in this appeal, brought by Members of the Parole Commission, is whether the introduction of hearsay evidence at the parole revocation hearing deprived Ash of his right to confront adverse witnesses.
Ash pled guilty in the D.C. Superior Court to possessing cocaine with the intention of selling it. After he served part of his four-to-twelve year…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Lamond D. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Trevino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Curtis v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.