Legal Opinion
State v. Abd-Rahmaan
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2005No. 75398-9PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
111 P.3d 1157 (2005)
154 Wash.2d 280
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Khatib M. ABD-RAHMAAN, Petitioner.
No. 75398-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 17, 2005.
Decided May 12, 2005.
Gregory Charles Link, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Petitioner.
Carla Barbieri Carlstrom, King Co. Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.
C. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 This case involves the issue of the admissibility of hearsay statements of unavailable witnesses in a sentencing modification hearing. Petitioner Khatib Abd-Rahmaan argues that the United States Supreme Court ruling in Crawford…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Detention of StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.