Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Hudson-Duncan & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1938No. 8716PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the Secretary of Agriculture from a decree of the district court holding that certain provisions of the Secretary’s Order, given.under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq., violate the Constitution and directing the Secretary to exempt the appellee from its operation.

Appellee, hereinafter called the Company, is a corporation engaged in the states of Oregon and Washington in the business of packing, processing, and distributing unshelled walnuts, both in intrastate and interstate commerce. It is not a grower of walnuts, but…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stringer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Oro Fina Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Gay Union Corporation v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Horne v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Panno v. United States. Evans Bros. Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API