Legal Opinion
Panno v. United States. Evans Bros. Packing Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1953No. 13510, 13511PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The appellants in each of these cases were found guilty under informations charging them with violation of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq. The information charged that the defendants violated the Act by handling oranges without a prorate allotment and without reporting information respecting certain sales, as required by Order No. 66 which had been issued by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
The facts, which were stipulated, were that the “handling” consisted of sales of oranges both produced and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rasmussen v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Riverbend Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Schepps Dairy, Inc., a Corporation v. Bob Bergland, Secretary, Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Kelly v. SchoonfieldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- United States v. Hinman Farms Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.