Hawaiian Equipment Co., Limited v. Eimco Corporation
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract. Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a money judgment in favor of respondent. The cause was tried before a jury in the court below and while we quote portions of the disputed evidence, for the purposes of this decision we are required to view the evidence from the standpoint most favorable to respondent.
Respondent, a corporation, is domiciled in Honolulu, Hawaii, and has for its principal business the exclusive dealership throughout the territory of Hawaii of certain machinery and equipment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox Film Corp. v. Ogden Theatre Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- Penn Star Mining Co. v. LymanUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Mifflin v. ShikiUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Read v. Forced Underfiring Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ney v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Birdzell v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Pickett v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- JR Stone Co., Inc. v. KeateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.