Birdzell v. Utah Oil Refining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Action by the appellant, plaintiff below, to recover damages for the alleged breach by the respondent of an oral contract to execute a sub-lease of real property. The trial court granted a motion made by the respondent for a summary judgment in its favor on the ground that neither the alleged agreement nor an adequate memorandum thereof was in writing as required by Section 33-5-3, Utah Code Annotated, 1943. From that judgment, this appeal is. brought by the appellant.
In 1936, the respondent, which had leased certain service station facilities at Wendover, Tooele County,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gaskill v. JacobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Handy v. BarclaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Rohan v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Upton Mill & Elevator Co. v. Baldwin Flour MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zion's Properties, Inc. v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- MacHan Hampshire Properties, Inc. v. Western Real Estate & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Baugh v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.