Legal Opinion

Mifflin v. Shiki

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1930No. 4952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission on an exchange of real estate. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The material allegations of the complaint are that on or about Februry 25, 1928, defendant employed plaintiff as a broker to procure a purchaser for certain real estate then owned by defendant at a price of not more than $13,000 if property was taken in exchange, and not more than $12,000 if sold for cash, and agreed to pay plaintiff for his services in procuring such purchaser a commission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Parker v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Leicht-Benson Realty & Construction Corp. v. J. D. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Watson v. OdellUtah Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Housing Inv. Corp. v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. FAIRLAWN PLAZA DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Fleming Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Hawaiian Equipment Co., Limited v. Eimco CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Blackburn v. BozoUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. FAIRLAWN PLAZA DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Fleming Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API