Legal Opinion
Polomski v. Polomski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 23, 1991No. 9303PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
On appeal from the judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage, the plaintiff claims that the trial court failed to give proper weight to the testimony of her expert witness regarding the value of the mari*492tal residence and that the trial court abused its discretion in distributing the marital assets. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellate review of financial orders following a judgment of dissolution is limited. Our role is to determine whether the court correctly applied the law and could reasonably have concluded as it did. Rostain v. Rostain, 214 Conn. 713, 716, 573 A.2d 710…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Rostain v. RostainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bobrow v. Borrow, No. Fa-97 0161580 S (Jul. 21, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Sanchez-Anglace v. Anglace, No. Fa99 0067378s (May 30, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000